Definiendo 'woke'

[InkeyZero]

[Baron Harkonen]

Qué fácil se detectan los Woke en este post, llevo contado tres.

[InkeyZero]

[InkeyZero]

En definitiva Woke fue un termino inventado por los supuestos defensores de los afroamericanos, denunciantes de la brutalidad policial. Luego lo empezaron a aplicar igualmente al "antiracismo".

El woke señala que si no eres "antiracista", eres un racista.

Si estas en desacuerdo con una perspectiva rebuscada sobre el racismo, eres racista sin darte cuenta, ya que el racismo es sistemico.

Esto luego degeneró y se amalgamó con la defensa por la comunidad gay, ahora denominada LGBTQ.

Empezaron a usar pronombres y terminos extraños. Por ejemplo, si usted es un hombre heterosexual, usted es cys male.

Empezaron a meter gente del lobby gay en grandes empresas, entre una de las que sufrió este embate ideologico fue la otrora empresa de Walt Disney, ahora conocida simplemente como Disney. El resultado es que su directiva definio que tenian que enseñar a transexuales en peliculas de Disney y el contenido debia ser multiracial y homosexual en un 50% del mismo.

En fin, el wokeismo es un compendio de puntos en la agenda "progresista" extrema americana.

Algo así

[InkeyZero]

Este es uno de esos hilos que los dem-regre-zurdos preferirían no haber abierto.



¿Se acuerdan cuando decían que su agenda era acerca de los derechos de dos adultos que consienten?

[InkeyZero]

Estos dijeron: Challenge accepted.







Este es un hilo extenso.


Esta es la excusa / mecanismo de defensa de los lander, gines y la fuerza del mundo para evitar la crítica:



Según gines las etiquetas son malucas, excepto cuando él y su caterva las usan para no tener que pensar por sí mismos.

[InkeyZero]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1636 ... 84322.html

1/
YOU CAN'T DEFINE WOKE!

Those who say we can't define woke or that it's just a slur or substitute for the N-word are playing word games in order to undercut your ability to highlight and criticize their ideas.

Let's talk about how it works.

So, defining "woke"

A Thread

2/
This was sparked by a Television interview where Bethany Mandel, who I consider a friend, was asked by the host Briana Joy Gray to define woke. Unfortunately, Bethany had difficulty giving a definiton, and in the moment just said Woke hard to define.

3/
Predictably, this lead to something of a pile on as a tweet of the moment went viral on twitter, with left leaning accounts claiming that when conservatives call things woke, that conservatives use as a slur. Here are just a couple of examples:



4/
This is part of a strategy by Critical Social Justice (AKA “woke”) activists to protect their ideology and worldview from criticism. They want prevent us from giving their ideology a name or a label in order to protect it from criticism.

Let's look at exactly how it works.

5/
You will likely have heard Social Justice activists say things like: "White privilege is a product of systemically racist social structures which center whiteness and marginalize people of color while reproducing white supremacy. This reinforces dominant power structures...

6/
and a cultural hegemony that benefits cisgendered heterosexual white males at the expense of BIPOC, Latinx, and LGBTQS2+ folx."

We've all seen that jargon coming from people with similar views, politics, and ideas, all demanding sweeping social change from the left.

7/
They may do advocacy in different areas, but the similarity of the language, and the fact they are always concerned with oppression, privilege, systemic power, diversity, equity, inclusion, inequality, sex, race, and gender indicate a coherent worldview is at work here.

8/
But, if we try to name that worldview we're told the name we pick is problematic, wrong, incorrect, bigoted, misleading or otherwise problematic.
Woke, Critical Race Theory, neo-marxism, cultural Marxism, Critical Social Justice...we're told all of these names are problematic.

9/
This inability to name this ideology prevents people from criticizing the project of social, cultural, and political change coming from the left. The woke want to demand social change without acknowledging, much less defending, the worldview at the center of their project

10/
Thus we have social and political movements, all of which use similar language, have similar policies, similar concerns, and which work together in “solidarity” with each other, all while claiming that there is no underlying common worldview which can be given a label.

11/
So I would like to now explain what I think is going on using Zebras as an analogy. This will make sense I promise you.

Many animals have fur, feathers, or skin that blends in to their environment. This camouflage helps them blend in and hide. This owl is a fine example:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrUjLf7WYAIuE-8.png

12/
Zebras, however, are different. Zebra’s are covered in black and white stripes even though the environment they live in is mostly brown and green. If you see a zebra by itself, it's very easy to see.

It's like they have a neon sign over them saying "lions, please eat me"


13/
So how does Zebra Camouflage work? It's simple: Zebra camouflage works by making zebras blend with the herd so that lions can't focus on any one zebra and target it. For Lions to kill a zebra they need to be able to pick one Zebra, focus on it, and then go after it. But...

14/
If lions can't pick a target the Zebras are safe.

Look at the pictures below and see how hard it would be to keep track of any one Zebra in the herd



15/
Scientists discovered this as they studied Zebras and got confused about which individual zebra was which, because all the zebras just blend into the herd.

So, they tried to fix this by tagging a zebra with red paint so they could keep track of it. Guess what happened?

16/
The Lions killed the tagged Zebra. A tagged zebra stands out from the herd so lions can tell it apart and focus the hunt on it. If a Zebra gets separated from the herd it loses the benefit of it's camouflage, at which point the lions can focus on it, target it, and kill it.

17/
This is a great analogy for the game the woke are playing.

Once a worldview is named and defined, it can then be pointed out, highlighted, and subjected to criticism. Once you can *IDENTIFY* a worldview or set of ideas you can focus on it and criticize it.

18/
Naming an idea lets us separate it from the herd of other ideas. The woke don't want us to label to their ideology because if that happens we can tag examples their ideology with a label when we see it. This lets us to highlight it, point it out, and examine it when we see it

19/
We label and name things to help us "tag" them, so we can point them out and focus on them, the woke are trying desperately to destroy all of our linguistic "tags." Woke activists do not want us to be able to single out their ideas and subject them to criticism.

20/
Woke ideas can't withstand proper rational and logical analysis. The lions of truth: evidence, logic, rationality, etc, will eat the Zebras of Wokeness, Gender Ideology, Critical Race Theory, and Critical Social Justice for lunch if they can focus on and identify them.

21/
So, to avoid getting eaten by the lions of reason the woke want to make their ideology impossible to focus on and tag, label, or name. They want their ideas to blend in with all our other ideas, as though wokeness fits right alongside reason, evidence, logic, and rationality.

22/
We need to use labels to be able to point at, highlight, and tag concepts so they can be seen and then examined for criticism. Using labels like "woke," "CRT," AND "Critical Social Justice," lets us tag woke ideas so we can hold them up to the light and examine them.

22/
This is what the woke want to avoid.

What the woke want is to act like all the bits of woke activism we see are unconnected phenomena spontaneously springing fourth in the name of justice in an organic and decentralized way.

23/
They want to act as though things like BLM, Defund the Police, “Diversity, equity, and Inclusion,” and Drag Queen Story Hour are diffuse and unconnected movements when in fact they are all connected by their adherence to an underlying worldview and ideology.

24/
Do not let them use linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand to hide their worldview. You do not need to give an exhaustive definition in every conversation. All you need is a definition of wokeness that communicates its ideas in a clear way so people can examine it.

25/
Neil Shenvi has offered a definition of wokeness which fits into a single tweet, and which will work in a pinch if you find yourself on the spot with a woke activist:


26/
Another short definition that fits in a tweet comes to use from @wil_da_beast630 and this is another short definition that you can use if a woke activist tries to say you don;t know what woke is, or that "woke" is just a slur.


27/
Below, I have given a more comprehensive definition of wokeness.

With a proper definition of wokeness now in view we should now proceed to make sure that we carefully, accurately, and carefully label things as Critical Social Justice or “Woke” when they fit that definition.


28/
The woke activists who labelled everyone they disagree with as:

-racist
-bigot
-sexist
-white supremacist
-nazi
-fascist
-transphobe
-homophobe
-ableist
-misogynist
-anti-black

Absolutely do not get to complain when we label them as "woke."

29/
Label fairly, use labels from their literature, and label accurately, do not hesitate to label those woke ideas and then subject those woke ideas to the bright light of rigorous criticism and analysis.

30/
I have written a full essay on this topic over on substack.

All my substack essays are available to everyone for free. However, if you find my work helpful you can support me with either a paid or free subscription.

Thank you for reading

[El Renacido]

[Baron Harkonen]

OU CAN'T DEFINE WOKE!

Those who say we can't define woke or that it's just a slur or substitute for the N-word are playing word games in order to undercut your ability to highlight and criticize their ideas.

Let's talk about how it works.

So, defining "woke"

A Thread

Gran hilo. Al final los Woke son una parranda de traumados con ideología Marxista.

[InkeyZero]

OU CAN'T DEFINE WOKE!

Those who say we can't define woke or that it's just a slur or substitute for the N-word are playing word games in order to undercut your ability to highlight and criticize their ideas.

Let's talk about how it works.

So, defining "woke"

A Thread

Gran hil. Al final los Woke son una parranda de traumados con ideología Marxista.

Hicieron lo mismo para tratar de "defender" a los delincuentes de antifa. Decían "antifa no existe", "antifa no es una organización, es una idea".

Ni hablar de los desastres de blm y la misma antifa en 2020.

Los wokes son los propios antisociales cobardes tira la piedra y esconde la mano.

[Senderos]

La mejor publicidad woke que se ha hecho, esos si los compraría por docenas.

Get Woke Go Rich.

[Tukki]

Definición de "Woke":

[InkeyZero]

[verdinegro]

Woke no es más que una redefinición de Tschandala. Lo describe genialmente Nietzsche al dividir la genealogía de la moral entre las creadas por señores y esclavos.

[dantesword]

Hoy en día ser retrasado mental es mejor que ser woke.

[InkeyZero]

[InkeyZero]

She is woke. Crazy, but woke.

¿Y ahora?

Para los woke, con amor.

































Saludos a todos los wokes de foro.

[Axio]

...
Satan quiere decir "Adversario". El SATANISMO no es un diablo con cachos, sino la subversion del Orden Natural y de los valores humanos. Subversion en pocas palabras es inversión, tomar una mesa y ponerla de patas arriba, poner a un esclavo de jefe del Gobierno, hacer de un hombre, una mujer y hacer que la mujer sea hombre.

¿estás seguro de ello? ¿por qué?

define orden natural y valores humanos, porque si de algo sabemos quienes han querido imponer tales predicamentos resulta que han sido los mas grandes genocidas de la historia de la civilización.

yo propondría que en la inocografía de satán mas que oponerse a un teismo divino, se trata de un anarquismo a todo proceso dominante de perversión a la exclusión de tales valores morales en la sociedad.

[imago]

El SATANISMO no es un diablo con cachos, sino la subversion del Orden Natural y de los valores humanos. Subversion en pocas palabras es inversión, tomar una mesa y ponerla de patas arriba, poner a un esclavo de jefe del Gobierno, hacer de un hombre, una mujer y hacer que la mujer sea hombre
El satanismo es a menudo mal entendido como una religión que adora a un diablo anudado. Sin embargo, esto está lejos de la verdad. El satanismo es una filosofía que busca subvertir el orden natural y los valores humanos. Es un sistema de creencias que se basa en el individualismo, la autocomplacencia y la liberación personal. Los satanistas rechazan la idea de un poder superior o deidad y en su lugar se centran en sus propios deseos y necesidades. Se ven a sí mismos como sus propios dioses y diosas, y se esfuerzan por lograr sus propios objetivos y ambiciones personales. El satanismo no se trata del mal o la oscuridad, sino de abrazar la propia naturaleza y rechazar las normas y expectativas de la sociedad. De esta manera, el satanismo es una subversión del status quo y un rechazo de los valores tradicionales.

El concepto de un orden natural o cósmico ha estado presente en varias religiones y sistemas de creencias a lo largo de la historia. Es la idea de que hay una estructura fundamental en el universo, un conjunto de reglas y principios que gobiernan todos los aspectos de la existencia. Este orden natural es visto como la base detrás de todas las revelaciones y religiones, proporcionando un marco para la comprensión de lo divino y el mundo que nos rodea. Muchas religiones tienen sus propias interpretaciones de lo que implica este orden natural, a menudo incorporando ideas de equilibrio, armonía e interconexión. Al comprender y alinearse con este orden cósmico, los individuos pueden lograr una comprensión más profunda de lo divino y su lugar en el mundo.

[verdinegro]

Espacio reservado.